Allow gift query parameter for more project types #476
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mohitb35 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/index.tsx (1)
459-463: Improve error handling for support link processingCurrently, API failures during support link processing are only logged to console. Consider enhancing the error handling to provide better user feedback.
Consider updating the error handling:
} catch (err) { - console.log("Error", err); + console.error("Failed to process support link:", err); + showErrorCard = true; + isGift = false; + giftDetails = null; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/index.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/index.tsx (1)
459-463: Enhance gift eligibility validation
The validation logic for gift eligibility has been improved by checking both:
- Project existence (
projectDetails !== null) - Project purpose compatibility (
!NON_GIFTABLE_PROJECT_PURPOSES.includes(projectDetails.purpose))
This change correctly extends gift support beyond tree projects while maintaining proper validation.
Let's verify the NON_GIFTABLE_PROJECT_PURPOSES constant:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the ProjectPurpose type to ensure we have a complete understanding of the validation:
Gift eligibility validation is correctly implemented
The validation logic is sound and properly implemented:
NON_GIFTABLE_PROJECT_PURPOSEScorrectly excludes only "planet-cash" and "bouquet" purposes- All other valid project purposes ("trees", "conservation", "funds", "reforestation") are eligible for gifts
- The null check on
projectDetailsprovides proper type safety
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the contents of NON_GIFTABLE_PROJECT_PURPOSES
rg -A 5 "NON_GIFTABLE_PROJECT_PURPOSES.*=" src/
Length of output: 421
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ProjectPurpose type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'type ProjectPurpose = $_'
Length of output: 498
mohitb35
force-pushed
the
feature/update-gift-param-logic
branch
from
57812dd to
68c040a
Compare
Enhance the handling of the gift query parameter to support additional project types beyond just tree projects.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes